Motocross first evolved in the United Kingdom
from motorcycle
trials competitions, such as the Auto-Cycle Clubs's first
quarterly trial in 1906 and the Scottish Six
Days Trial that began in 1909.[1][2] When delicate balancing and strict
scoring of trials were dispensed with in favour of a race to be the fastest
rider to the finish, it was called scrambles, said to have originated in the
phrase, "a rare old scramble" describing one such early race.[1] Originally known as scrambles racing
in the United Kingdom, as the sport grew in popularity, the competitions became
known internationally as motocross racing, by combining the French word for
motorcycle, motocyclette, or moto for short, into
a portmanteau with
"cross country".[1]
Motocross first evolved in the United Kingdom
from motorcycle
trials competitions, such as the Auto-Cycle Clubs's first
quarterly trial in 1906 and the Scottish Six
Days Trial that began in 1909.[1][2] When delicate balancing and strict
scoring of trials were dispensed with in favour of a race to be the fastest
rider to the finish, it was called scrambles, said to have originated in the
phrase, "a rare old scramble" describing one such early race.[1] Originally known as scrambles racing
in the United Kingdom, as the sport grew in popularity, the competitions became
known internationally as motocross racing, by combining the French word for motorcycle, motocyclette,
or moto for short, into a portmanteau with
"cross country".[1] (Wikipedia
44).
The two competitions that started motocross
were the Auto-Cycle Clubs and the Scottish Six Days. Motocross started in the
United Kingdom. The whole idea in the beginnings of motocross was to be the
first person to finnish in the race, but they weren't called races but rather
"scrambles." The word motocross was created by combining the French
word Motocross with cross-country (page 1 wikipedia.)
Paragraphs one and two are accurate, although including the indicators for the footnotes is probably not something most people would do if they were actually plagiarizing from Wikipedia. In two you cite "Wikipedia 44"--what's 44? Three looks like a good paraphrase, but remember that if you actually cite it, then it is not plagiarism. Four is not plagiarized at all because you quote your source. Is the quote not actually from Wikipedia though? Inventing quotes is not plagiarism, although it is another form of academic dishonesty.
ReplyDelete